Research
Beyond Groceries: Forecast Confidence and the Gender Gap in Inflation Expectations (last updated: September 2025)
Winner of the Bundesbank Early Career Prize in Financial Literacy Research (2024) and Royal Economic Society Best Poster Award (2023)
Finalist of the ECB Young Economist Prize (2025)
CESifo Working Paper No. 11588
Presented at: University of Copenhagen (March 2023), University of Oxford (April 2023), RES PhD Conference (June 2023), Bocconi University (June 2023), University of Bamberg (July 2023), CEPR Central Bank Communication Seminar Series (October 2023), CEPR Symposium (December, 2023), National Bank of Belgium (December 2023), Norges Bank Spring Institute (March 2024), RES Annual Conference (March, 2024), Stanford University (April 2024), European Central Bank (October, 2024), University of Bergamo (October, 2024), University of Mannheim (November, 2024), CESifo Munich (December 2024), Bundesbank Spring Conference (April, 2025), ECB Forum (July 2025), SAFE Household Finance Workshop (July 2025), CEPR Household Finance Conference (September 2025), European Central Bank (October 2025)
This paper develops a theoretical framework to understand heterogeneity in inflation expectations. I integrate two mechanisms previously studied in isolation, exposure to salient prices and forecast confidence, within a Bayesian learning model. Empirically, I examine these mechanisms through the well-documented gender gap in inflation expectations. German and US household data confirm that forecast confidence is the dominant driver, while exposure to grocery prices matters only for low-confidence respondents. Forecast confidence is improved by financial literacy. Beyond gender, I provide a lens to study demographic heterogeneity, and show that salient prices exert greater influence during periods of elevated macroeconomic uncertainty.
Divergent Perceptions, Divergent Pay: Inflation and the Gender Wage Gap (2025, together with Nicolò Maffei-Faccioli)
Winner of the SNDE Young Scholar Award (2025) and ICEEE LABOUR Prize in Microeconometrics (2025)
Presentation
New!!! Working Paper
Presented at: Kiel Institute & CEPR (March 2025), Society for Nonlinear Dynamics (March 2025), MMF PhD Conference (April 2025), Bank of Finland & CEPR (May 2025), 11th ICEEE (May 2025), University of Oxford (June, 2025), IAAE Conference (June 2025), NorMac (August 2025), Oslo Macro Conference (August 2025), European Central Bank (October 2025)
How does the gender wage gap respond to inflation? We show that it widens after both supply- and demand-driven inflationary shocks. This widening reflects gender differences in labor market perceptions: women interpret inflation as a signal of deteriorating conditions, while men perceive mild improvement. These divergent beliefs reduce women’s willingness to negotiate, slowing their nominal wage growth relative to men’s. To formalize this mechanism, we develop a New Keynesian search-and-matching model where workers do not observe the true nature of the shock and women form ambiguity averse beliefs while men are ambiguity loving. The model replicates the observed cyclicality of the gender wage gap, establishing a novel link between inflation and gender inequality.
Five Facts About Inflation Expectations: Evidence from Four Different Groups of Agents (2024, together with Eleonora Granziera, Nicolò Maffei-Faccioli, Michael Weber and Tuva Marie Fastbø)
Norges Bank Working Paper
Presented at: Norges Bank (September 2024), Bank of Italy (November, 2024), Czech National Bank (November, 2024), Banque de France (March 2025), Society for Nonlinear Dynamics (March, 2025), IAAE Conference (June 2025), CEBRA (August 2025), Oslo Macro Conference (August 2025), University of Nuremberg (September 2025)
We provide five facts about the inflation expectations of households, firms, social partners, and economists from harmonized data spanning more than two decades: (i) Households’ mean expectations were highest pre-inflation surge, but firms’ expectations were highest since 2021 due to differential energy price movements. (ii) Disagreement displays similar patterns. (iii) Short-term shape medium-term forecasts, with magnitudes differing across groups and regimes. (iv) The pass-through from inflation to wage expectations is below one, strongest for business leaders and weakest for social partners. (v) Electricity price shocks causally raise inflation expectations. Taken together, the unanchoring of inflation expectations is pervasive across time and groups but the threat of price-wage spirals remains limited.
Who’s on FIRE? Household characteristics and the formation of inflation expectations (2024, together with Gabriele Galati, Richhild Moessner and Maarten van Rooij)
Presented at: Czech National Bank (November 2024), De Nederlandsche Bank (March 2025), University of Padova (September 2025)
DNB Working Paper No 852
We study how consumers form and revise inflation expectations using a unique, highly balanced monthly panel of Dutch households. We develop a Bayesian framework that nests Full-Information Rational Expectations (FIRE) alongside common forecasting heuristics and test it by recovering person-specific belief-updating rules from individual time-series regressions. Our novel individual-level design reveals substantial heterogeneity in how households process information over time. On average, consumers systematically overreact to current inflation, echoing patterns found for professional forecasters. Only 2.5 percent, predominantly wealthier, more educated men, behave consistently with FIRE. Most consumers rely on simple heuristics, especially adaptive expectations. Our results show that heuristic learning, not FIRE, characterizes expectation formation for the vast majority of households. Crucially, heterogeneity in belief updating is both large and systematic.
Narratives of Inflation: Evidence from the US and South Africa (2025)
Experiment registered at the AEA RCT Registry: AEARCTR-0012206
Presented at: University of Oxford (June, 2024), Czech National Bank (November 2024), CSAE Conference (March 2025), South African Reserve Bank (June, 2025)
How do consumers update beliefs about the labor market in response to (dis)inflationary surprises? This paper finds that inflation shocks \textit{causally} increase unemployment expectations and reduce perceived job-finding probabilities in the US and South Africa. Such beliefs can explain large union wage premia for inflation surges, as seen in South Africa. Comparing the results to an emerging economy more exposed to supply-side shocks is important as narratives of inflation differ substantially and policy conclusions from advanced economies may not apply.